Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam – Defamation and Assault

What's inside

• Criminal Law25 questions
• Tort Law19 questions

Sample practice questions

1. D plans to rob a bookmaker. A, who knows of D's plan, passes him in the street hours before the robbery, says once "you can do it, they've got plenty", and never contacts D again. D carries out the robbery entirely on his own; nothing in the evidence shows that A's words affected D's decision or the way the robbery…
2. Which scenario most closely matches the objective elements of the German 'perpetrator behind the perpetrator' (Täter hinter dem Täter) doctrine as described in the material?
3. State the objective element and the subjective element of instigating (soliciting, inducing, counselling) as set out in the material.

Add the course to answer these with instant feedback.